Legal engine for AI-drafted work
Catch the legal errors before the court does.
Sabata checks AI-generated legal documents against the statutes. It removes invented citations, flags reasoning that does not follow from the law, and asks for the facts a draft quietly assumed.
The Claimant, though not a party to the supply agreement, is entitled to enforce the warranty in clause 9, which expressly confers a benefit on the Claimant by name.
This was affirmed in Chua v Meridian Logistics [2023] SGHC 4127, and the Defendant cannot now resist enforcement.
The parties plainly intended the Claimant to have that right.
The problem
AI is drafting for court. Nobody is checking it at scale.
Hallucinated content
Fictitious cases and misquoted law are turning up in court submissions, filed by lawyers and litigants in person alike.
Weak citations
Real authorities cited for propositions they do not support leave a client's case thinner than it looks.
Unstated assumptions
Drafts assume conditions the law requires to be proved, and lawyers lose time finding the gaps one by one.
Who filed the AI errors courts have found
- 57%Litigants in person
- 40%Lawyers
- 3%Judges, experts, prosecutors and others
Source: AI Hallucination Cases database, damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations
Today these errors are caught by hand, one by one, before filing or in the middle of proceedings. When they are missed, the cost runs from rejected submissions and fines to lost cases and disciplinary action.
The solution
Automated verification and correction of AI-generated legal documents
Sabata reads a draft the way an experienced lawyer reviews a junior's work: every authority checked, every step of reasoning tested against the statute.
Citation check
Finds and removes citations that do not exist or do not support the point they are cited for.
Reasoning check
Identifies, flags and corrects legal reasoning errors by checking each conclusion against the statutes.
Litigation strategy
Turns a verified position into a litigation plan, with the strategy explained step by step.
The product
Draft in, verified document out
AI-generated input
- Hallucinations
- Reasoning errors
- Fictitious references
- Circular definitions
- No litigation strategy
Sabata output
- Free from hallucinations
- Reasons like a lawyer
- Validated references
- No circular definitions
- Legal strategy explained
Verification results can feed back into the legal AI tools your firm already uses, so they correct their own errors too.
Why now
GenAI adoption has met strict judicial oversight
Explosive GenAI adoption
Lawyers and litigants rely on AI tools for drafting, creating unprecedented volumes of unverified legal content.
Zero tolerance from courts
Judges are cracking down on AI hallucinations with strict mandates, mandatory disclosures and severe sanctions.
Reliable legal reasoning
Rule-based legal reasoning now makes structured verification of complex arguments and citations practical.
Why Sabata
Legally verified, and automated
Symbolic reasoning core
Deterministic, rule-based legal reasoning that validates outputs explicitly and logically. The same facts always give the same result.
Logic and conflict checker
Removes circular logic, contradictions and flawed steps before a document reaches the court.
Built for boutique and independent practice
Gives practitioners without an army of associates a way to double-check every AI-drafted argument.
Who it's for
From sole practitioners to litigants in person
Law firms
Per-seat annual licences for small and mid-sized practices handling litigation and corporate work.
Litigants in person
A light access-to-justice subscription to sanity-check filings for tribunals and small claims.
Legal AI providers
Verification through our MCP server, so AI tools can check and correct their own output.
See the engine reason today
Our statute assistant runs on the same rules engine. Register for a demo and we will walk you through it on questions from Singapore employment, contract and civil procedure law, or UK anti-money laundering rules.
Register for a demoTeam
Founders
Jade Zhu
Founder, Director and CEO
Yan Mi, PhD
Founder, Director and CSO
Zoltan Gelencser
Founder, Director and CTO
Pilot programme
We are piloting with Singapore practices.
If your firm drafts with AI and wants every citation and argument checked before filing, talk to us about joining.